The UNmen

Well, if anyone had any questions about the UN's objectivity, this should pretty much settle it:
They don't have any. If given the chance, they will side with terrorists and third world dictators (being primarily composed of such) at every opportunity.

Someone pointed out to me that this violates the UN's own statues. And indeed it does, clearly aiding and abetting a terrorist organization who hides behind civilians (and boasts of this fact) while targeting civilians and militia indiscriminately with homegrown and Tehramascus-supplied rockets.

As if the UN cares about their own statutes...
An interesting characteristic of the UN is that they're incredibly corrupt, ineffective, and biased, but they don't seem to care about even appearing useful in any way. Most international governing bodies attempt to preserve at least some sort of legitimacy, but the UN just doesn't seem to want to bother with unnecessary trifles such as promoting the ideals they clame to support.

Atrocities commited by UN 'peacekeepers' in the Belgian Congo?
Contracts manipulated so Kofi's son can receive illegal payouts?
And now feeding restricted information to Hezbollah?
Eh, they shrug. And propose a global tax so they can have more money to waste.
Repeat, ad inifinitum et ad nauseum.

Why are they still in New York? A city still rebuilding the wreckage of 9-11 is no place for an organization that provides military intelligence to terrorist organizations.